4,304
edits
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikipedia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Recommendation of non-free software
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:You are right. The point is that, even if a closed-souce software, utorrent is a really good bittorrent client. I use myself Transmission, but Transmission is buggy with web seeds, so we can not recommend it. I don't know qBittorrent, this is a problem. If If I had to change to an open-source software, I would propose [http://deluge-torrent.org/ deluge]. You can change for deluge if you want, I agree. [[User:Kelson|Kelson]] ([[User talk:Kelson|talk]]) 22:36, 23 January 2015 (CET) | :You are right. The point is that, even if a closed-souce software, utorrent is a really good bittorrent client. I use myself Transmission, but Transmission is buggy with web seeds, so we can not recommend it. I don't know qBittorrent, this is a problem. If If I had to change to an open-source software, I would propose [http://deluge-torrent.org/ deluge]. You can change for deluge if you want, I agree. [[User:Kelson|Kelson]] ([[User talk:Kelson|talk]]) 22:36, 23 January 2015 (CET) | ||
::I also use Transmission (in Debian stable). Just tried Deluge on Windows 7 and the GUI freezes from time to time. In the same machine, with the same torrents, µTorrent worked correctly. I'm sure there is no single client which is open source, bug free, multiplatform, with the prettiest GUI and recently updated. That's way I would prefer a more neutral approach and link to the comparison of clients. | |||